He replied:
"Banning asbestos is ridiculous, and you can quote better authorities than me. It is dangerous when, and only when, it is likely to be inhaled. This is like banning gasoline because people can get burned with it. Good luck on your work for common sense."
On this note, I just wanted to post this picture:
and this unsettling picture:
True! To quote: "It is dangerous when, and only when, it is likely to be inhaled"
I'd like to ask this leading pathologist - how long is the woman above who is filtering asbestos fibres into easy to carry sacks supposed to hold her breath?
Will the workers in the picture below not suffer any side affewcts if they tie a permeable piece of cloth infront of their noses and mouths?
To say the the least - it astounded me how ill supportive a qualified and educated medical practitioner could be. To compare asbestos to gasoline is absurd! I'd like to point out that the ban asbestos initiatives are set up to put pressure on the asbestos trade companies to be responsible. There possibly could never be a true ban on asbestos as it is prevalent in schools and construction sites worldwide. I believe the appeals and campaigns condoning a ban on asbestos are not wanting to erradicate it for good - but are wanting to create environments where people can live safely without hazard. Where the transportation of this mineral is extremely controlled and responsibilty is taken for those less fortunate in poor areas of the world.